Friday 17 March 2017

Debunking Hate Pastor Steven Anderson's Hinduphobic Youtube Series "Hindu Moment"

Lately Steven Anderson, a Hate-Pastor of the cult Faithful Word Baptist Church based in Temple, Arizona, USA, has been creating videos about Hinduism and publishing them on Youtube.

All of these videos about Hinduism are Hinduphobic in nature and will only cause an increase in hate and hate crimes against Hindus.

Hindu Moment #1 - Definition of Yoga
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 4:31

In his first video "Definition of Yoga", Anderson defines Yoga from dictionary.com. To Hindus, Yoga is a spiritual journey whose end goal is Liberation from this world of suffering and attaining eternal Union (Yoga) with the Supreme Spirit.

At 1:10 he makes the claim that the Supreme Spirit of Hinduism is not the God of the Bible, and although that does not mean anything in particular to us Hindus as we do not worship the god of the Bible, what it really means in the context in which he is speaking is that the Supreme Spirit or Paramatma as we know it to be is not the real God. 

At 1:17 he makes a mention of a film he made which was supposedly a "documentary" that was later taken down by Youtube due to its hateful Hinduphobic contents. This film he claims, "proved conclusively" that the God we Hindus worship is none other than the Christian Devil himself.

He than tries to wrongfully define Yoga as "seeking to have union with the devil" and labels doing Yoga as demonic.

At 1:42 he quotes a Bible verse that suggests that we Hindus are infidels, worship a demon, and anything Hindu "unclean". Anderson than interprets (2:37)  this verse as inferring to not do Yoga and for Christians to not associate themselves with us Hindus.

A 3:22 he calls the Supreme Spirit an unclean spirit and suggests that the Supreme Spirit is not Jesus Christ or the "Holy" Spirit.

At 4:03, Anderson labels the Vedic deities as "false gods" and concludes (4:08) the video by stating that people should abstain from doing Yoga which he suggests is an "appearance of evil" and a "fruitful work of darkness".

In all humbleness, all of Anderson's conclusions and assumptions are plain wrong. No Yoga is not evil. and demonic No Yoga will not lead you in union with a demon. No the Supreme Spirit is not an unclean spirit. No our God is not a demon. And NO we are not Infedils who revere false vedic deities.

All the claims Anderson has made clearly dehumanise Hindus and paints spiritual practices such as Yoga as evil. 

Yoga is a spiritual journey, whether you do it just for its physical aspects or for its full spiritual benefits, it truly is a marvelous practice which gives its practitioner a peace of mind. 

Ignore everything this hate-pastor has said and don't let his words deter you from practicing Yoga.

May you have a fulfilling spiritual journey.

Hindu Moment #2 - Obama Worships Hindu Gods
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 3:22

Hindu Moment #3 - Jesus Never Went to India
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 4:54

Hindu Moment #4 - Worshiping other Gods
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 2:46

Hindu Moment #5 - Fire Sacrifice & King of Death
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 1:49

Hindu Moment #6 - Hindu Song about You Being God
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 2:54

Hindu Moment #7 - The Supreme Magician
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 3:02

Hindu Moment #8 - Hinduism: Perfect Religion for New World Order
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 3:24

Hindu Moment #9 - Dung is Holy to Hindus
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 3:37

Hindu Moment #10 - The Satanic teaching that You are God
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 3:19

Hindu Moment #11 - Being Born Again
Published: March 15, 2017             Run time: 3:20

Wednesday 1 March 2017

Ramayana - Myth or Historical?

This is the age of Kalyug, where demons rule and lies and ignorance are construed to be true. The one and only aim of Kalikaal, the devil, is to destroy Dharma and bring suffering upon us all. In his mission to spread lies, the Demon King will try to poison our minds against us. To do so, he must first attack our Shastr, the collective Holy Scriptures of Hinduism.

Remember the Devil is smart, and he works in such a way as to appear that neither does he exist, nor is he the cause of our suffering. But we are the wiser, and I know you to be wise, for you are wise to come here and learn the ways of the Dharma and Bhakti. Your wisdom is the reflection of your intellect. For you know, that this is the Kalyug.

In order to destroy our faith and relationship with our God, Kalikaal is slowly weaving a web of lies accusing Ramayana, Mahabharata, and the Puranas to be nothing more than myths and legends, and the mere imagination of some men living in the huts of old.

In doing so, Kalikaal hopes that once the credibility of the Hindu texts is destroyed, people will no longer believe in them. By claiming that our gods are false, he hopes that we will not believe in them, hence losing all hopes in liberation and our way to eternal union with God.

Dear friends, today I, along with you, will dispel the darkness of the lies of kalikaal covering us. Today, I will provide you with some evidence and common sensual logic, that the Ramayana is the account of true historical event, that Lord Rama was a real historical figure and not a mere hero of the myths and legends of the old, that Kalikaal and his soldiers of ignorance in the West, weave against the knowledge of the East, We, the Hindu people.

The historicity of the Ramayana is the question of the Ramayanas "acceptability as a history” extended to the question of Hindu Ramacharitramanas as an accurate record of the historical Rama and the Treta Yug.

Many fields of study span the Ramayana and history, such fields range from archeology and astronomy to linguistics and comparative literature. Scholars also examine the historical context of Ramayana passages, the importance ascribed to events by the authors, and the comparison between the descriptions of these events and historical evidence.

Archaeological discoveries in the 19th,20th the and 21st century have supported most of Ramayanas historical narratives.

The Ramayana is an ancient Indian epic poem which narrates the struggle of the divine prince Rama to rescue his wife Sita from the demon king Ravana. Along with the Mahabharata, it forms the Sanskrit Itihasa.

Itihasa consists of the Mahabharata and the Ramayana and sometimes the Puranas too and literally means “history”.

Itihāsas and Purāṇas are mentioned in the Atharva Veda and referred to as the fourth Veda.

Ramcharitmanas, is an epic poem in the Awadhi dialect of Hindi, composed in the 16th-century, Goswami Tulsidas. Ramcharitmanas literally means "Lake of the deeds of Rama”, and is considered as one of the greatest works of Hindi literature. The work has variously been acclaimed as "the living sum of Indian culture", "the tallest tree in the magic garden of medieval Indian poetry", "the greatest book of all devotional literature" and "the best and most trustworthy guide to the popular living faith of the Indian people".

Tulsidas was a great Sanskrit scholar. However, he wanted the story of Rama to be accessible to the general masses and not just the Sanskrit-speaking elite. In order to make the story of Rama as accessible to the layman as possible, Tulsidas chose to write in Awadhi, a local dialect of Hindi which was the popular language of the time. Tulsidas had to face a lot of criticism from the Sanskrit scholars. However, Tulsidas remained and his work was accepted by all.

For the first time in Hindu history, the story of Rama was made available to the common man to sing, meditate and perform on.

However, the unfortunate fact is the idea of whether Lord Rama exists or not has been called into question, by no less than some Hindus themselves, let alone the enemies of Hinduism and foreign cults. So it is a wonder how such persons can be accepted as the members of the Hindu Family (Sangha) who should be concerned with preserving and protecting the culture of their people.

Obviously, they are neither concerned nor aware of the depths of information that can be found in support of the traditions for which we Hindus are known for. Or, are they being corrupted by leftist, communist pseudo-secularism, really trying to dismantle or destroy the authority of the timeless nature of the culture of our great people, where they try to insult and put down Hinduism as something primitive in order to impress the followers of other religions and the Western culture, in hopes to appear more modern, secular, and westernised.

These ignorant people dismiss the truths of the Ramayana as something of the mere figment of imagination. They make false lies that the Ramayan is of a recent making.  Hasmukh Dhirajlal Sankalia,an INDIAN archaeologist has proposed a date of the 4th century BC for the composition of the text. And Western Historian and Indologist Arthur Llewellyn Basham opined that “Rama may have been a MINOR chief who lived in the 8th or the 7th century BCE.

Just by a mere mention of these recent dates they trivialise the great history of the Hindu people. By claiming that either Ramayana is imaginary or recent or that our Lord Ram was just a mere minor Chief is not only insulting and discrediting towards us Hindus as a people, but also towards our culture, religion, and our relationship to our God.

However, when it comes to the Ramayana and the history of Lord Rama, there have been numerous authors who have accepted the Ramayana as a history of ancient events. For example, the first Governor General of India, Sri Rajaji, wrote on the Ramayana and called it a history, as also did the English Indologist Sir William Jones. Various other western authors have made a study of the culture and history of the Ramayana, such as Philip  Lutgendorf in his book Rama’s Story in Shiva’s City, California University; Joe Burkhalter Flueckiger and Laurie Sears in The Boundaries of Traditional Ramayana and Mahabharata Performances in South and Southeast Asia, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; W. L. Smith on Ramayan Traditions in Eastern India, University of Stockholm, and others.

There are also numerous places that are indicated as the locations where various events happened in reference to the pastimes of Lord Rama and Sita. Thus, they are accepted as historical sites. There are many places, such as Ramesvaram, Nasik, Hampi, and others where there are particular locations and sites that are related to the events that took place in the life and adventures of Lord Rama. Many people accept these sites as the locations for the events described in the Ramayana. So how can this be unless there are not some reality behind it?

However, why is there not more archaeological evidence that points towards Rama’s existence? Because such an effort has not been made in India and systematic excavations have never been carried out, says historian Nandita Krishnan. She says that to doubt the existence of Rama is to doubt all literature. There is little archaeological or epigraphic evidence for either Jesus Christ or Prophet Mohammed, who are known only from the Bible and Koran respectively. Does it mean they did not exist? If Rama performs miracles such as liberating Ahalya, the Biblical story of Jesus walking on water or the Koranic tale of Mohammed flying to heaven on a horse are equally miraculous. Such stories reinforce divinity.

She also describes in summary what areas the events of Lord Rama’s life took place, “The Ramayana is geographically very correct. Every site on Rama's route is still identifiable and has continuing traditions or temples to commemorate Rama's visit. Around 1000 BC or earlier, no writer had the means to travel around the country inventing a story, fitting it into local folklore and building temples for greater credibility”.

“In 1975 the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) unearthed fourteen pillar bases of kasauti stone with Hindu motifs near the mosque at Ayodhya; reports of the excavations are available with the ASI. Rama was born in Ayodhya and married in Mithila, now in Nepal. Not far from Mithila is Sitamarhi, where Sita was found in a furrow, still revered as the Janaki kund constructed by her father Janaka. Rama and Sita left Mithila for Ayodhya via Lumbini. In 249 BC, Ashoka erected a pillar in Lumbini with an inscription referring to the visits by both Rama and Buddha to Lumbini. Ashoka was much nearer in time to Rama and would be well aware of his facts.

In describing the places in Sri Lanka that are associated with Lord Rama and the Ramayana, "Sri Lankan folklore and religious scholars have identified more than 30 places on the island which are associated with the Ramayana. And interestingly enough, people in these places have a strong sense of history and lore, and a strong sense of possession. They are proud of their association with the Hindu epic," explained S. Kalaiselvan, director general Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority. This is the case, even though 90 percent of the people in the Ramayana­related areas are Sinhalese Buddhists.

Once the Historicity, of the Ramayana is established, ignorant detractors will than try to attack the fact that there are different variations of Ramayana.

I remember I was once watching this video of this radical Islamist preacher Zakir Naik, whose one of the main aim is to make Hinduism look bad. He made the claim that Hindus have so many versions of Ramayana, that which one was the true one. How do you know which is true? You have so many versions of just one holy book that you do not know the truth and fall into confusion.

Well my fellow Hindu brothers and sister, today I will bring forth the answers.
Now this morning I want to preach on the subject on why there are so many versions of Ramayana. When we say the many versions of the ramayana we're referring to the now lost Hanumad Ramayana, Valmiki Ramayana, Ramacharitramanas, and other regional and outside versions. Now, personally the Ramacharitramanas is my favourite part of the Hindu Shastras. I feel like the Ramayana is the heart of the Shastras.

These books, Valmiki Ramayana, Ramacharitramanas, Ramayana of Mahabharata, and the Puranas, give us the life of Lord Rama. They talk about his birth, his exile, his preaching, his miracles, and of course most importantly they talk about his war with the Demon-King Ravana to rescue his wife Sita. But the question is, why are there so many versions of the Ramayana. Why did God not just give us one account of this great story. First of all the obvious answer is that it's such a great story that it's worth telling over and over again, and it will never get old. Not only that, there are different things that are emphasized in each versions of the Ramayana. They have different themes, you get a little bit of a different viewpoint of the life of God Rama by reading them.

Not only that but if you think about what the Ramayanas represent, they also represent eye witness testimony, telling us that these things really happened and that they really are true. Especially the the lost Hanumad Ramayana emphasizes the fact that he is a witness and that he's bearing record and that he's giving a testimony. If you go to a court room and there were only one witness to something, that's not supposed to be enough to convict anyone because that one person could be lying. Often what you'll have is corroborating testimony. Now corroborating testimony is someone else's independent testimony that supports the testimony of the other person and shows it to be true.

If we were to walk into a courtroom and we had 4 witnesses get up and testify to something, and they both gave the exact same testimony, and they included the same details, and they left out the same details, we would say, These witnesses have gotten together and gotten their story straight. They're not independent witnesses. It wouldn't be as credible, it would seem like, Wait a minute, something's fishy here, where these 4 different people are remembering everything exactly the same way and giving the exact same testimony because that is not the way that the real world works.

See, when you go into a courtroom and you hear a different testimony from different people, they'll give different testimony, but that testimony corroborates the testimony, or it could contradict. If it contradicts then there's a problem, somebody's lying, or somebody's not remembering properly. The thing about the different versions are that's so amazing is that they are accounts of the same story and they are corroborating the testimonies in the sense that they don't read exactly the same. In fact many people when they read them will even think that they see contradictions in the different versions and say, This appears to contradict, but then once you study a little further you can see that there is no contradiction, that they do corroborate one another.

But the fact that they are so different from one another proves that they're not just feeding off of one another. That Hanuman didn't write his Ramayana and then Valmiki comes along and says, I'm going to write one now and just make a few changes but I'm pretty much going to say the exact same thing, and then Vashishta does the same thing and Tulsidass.

Vashishta Ramayana is about a dialogue between Lord Ram and Rishi Vashishta and is an exposition on dispassion, the behaviour of the seeker (of Lord), birth of all creation, meditation, and freedom and liberation.

So, they're all clearly different. Even worldly secular scholars who don't even believe in the Hindu Shastras actually state that these are 4 independent works and that none of them has copied from the other, that they did not have access to the other and copy from it. They'll actually admit that. Some try to of course have all these theories about how they could have been so consistent yet they were independent by saying that there's this other document, the Valmiki Ramayana that they're all copyingr from. No, that is a lie, in fact Lord Shiva is the one revealing things to Tulsidas.

The early versions are actually a perfect eye witness testimony giving different details appearing to contradict on the surface only to the unlearned, only to those who haven't studied. Once you do study it out you see that they corroborate.

Once you learn you can see how it all fits together so perfectly, but they're definitely not copying each other. These are independent accounts. Of course we know Valmiki Ramayana was narrated to Valmiki by Sita Ma, written down by Valmiki, than validated by Lord Rama once Luv and Kush, when the came and recited the Valmiki Ramayana in the Lord’s Court. And that it's the word of God. There are different versions of Ramayana, to give corroborating testimonies, not testimonies where they all got together and got their stories straight, but different corroborating testimonies, which is the strongest type of evidence. Then secondly in order to emphasize different things.

Hanumad Ramayana may have been a biography and the relationship between Lord Rama and his contemporary, Lord Hanuman. Valmiki Ramayana was about recording history, a biography of the Lord focusing more on his human nature, and Ramacharitramanas, which focuses more on the divinity of Lord Rama and bhakti one can show to him, with the main aim of being available to the common man.

Then there are so many outside versions, each written down in different levels for each and every nations of the world. Just Think about it.

Yama Zatdaw for Burma, Reamker  for Cambodia,  Kakawin Ramayana, Indonesia, Phra Lak Phra Lam for Laos, Hikayat Seri Rama for Malaysia, Maharadia Lawana for Philippines and Ramakien ,Thailand. All of these nations now either Christian, Muslim, or Buddhist were once Hindus Nations, and the Hindu people of these kingdoms held Lord Rama very dearly before they were forcefully converted out of Hinduism either because inquisition due to colonialism or by the edge of the sword by sultanate conquest.

The Ramayana was also composed into the Persian Ramayan-e-Masih, by the Muslim Sheikh Sadullah Masih Panipati, a contemporary of Shah Jahah and Jahangir. We even have the Urdu version called the Pothi Ramayana written in the 17th century, making the life and miracle of Lord Rama to Pakistanis as well.

Now that Valmiki Ramayana and the Ramacharitramanas has been translated into the English Language, the GOBLE Language, everyone can be reached.

In fact, the very fact that we have so many versions reflect on this very fact that the many versions of the Ramayana were written so that it could reach its target audience. Otherwise how else could Hinduism reach to distant places such as the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the other East Asian countries if it were not for these early Hindu Missionaries writing the local versions of Ramayana in order to reach the people who do not know Lord Ram.

In this way, as we go through the evidence, we can see how Lord Rama was an actual historic personality, as described in the Ramayana and in other Puranic texts. Nonetheless, there will always be those for whom no matter what you present for verification, it will not be enough. Some just won't believe it. Some will, some won't, so what? But many in the world already accept the authority of the Ramayana and other Vedic texts for the verification of the existence of Lord Rama.


There are so many things we learn in the different versions of the Ramayana, in addition to getting the salvation of our soul we also get a role model on which to pattern our lives. Let's bow our heads and have a word of prayer. Lord Ram we thank you so much for these  wonderful books, Lord, even if the Hindu Shastra just consisted of Ramacharitamanas and nothing else it would be the most amazing book on earth. It is truly the greatest story ever told. It's most assuredly worth reading 4 times, and 40 times, and 400 times. Lord please help us to study the whole Ramayana, but Lord I pray that we would have special love in our hearts for it that would increase as a result of this prachaar. 


A Hindu Brahmin Girl Gives Excuses To Justify Beef Consumption, Here's Why You Should Not Agree With Her.


http://www.rajnikantvscidjokes.in/hindu-brahmin-girls-conversation-man-eating-beef-will-make-go-wtf/

The above link directs to a Whatsapp conversation between a Devout Hindu and Hindu Brahmin girl who support beef consumption.

I don't agree with her justifications, and neither should you.

Cow are considered mother figures to us Hindus. It is our duty to serve and protect her and ensure she is not slaughtered and flesh consumed. It is our mission and sadly we are failing it.

Americans and Europeans eat beef and other meat, but they consider dogs as their best friend and so refrain from eating their meat. Their devotion to their friend is so strong that they are actively campaigning in China and parts of Asia where dog meat is consumed to stop their slaughter and consumption.

They can do so much for their best friends, yet we Hindus who consider cows our mothers are just making excuses to justify her flesh being eaten by others and even some unfaithful Hindus.


Our fellow Hindu brothers and sisters should know Dharma is always supreme in this world. It is only through the following our duties set forth in Dharma do we maintain social order and Dharma.
It is in this social order in Dharma do we get basic Human Freedoms and Rights.

And so I urge my fellow Hindu brothers and sister to rise up against such petty excuses, rise up and follow our Dharma. We must protect our mother cow at all cost because she is our mother, and like all mothers she must be served and protected.

Jai Hind and Om Har Har Mahadev!









Sunday 26 February 2017

When was Hinduism Founded? Answer: 8000 BCE


To many Hindus, Hinduism has always been in existence. It is unborn and eternal, hence its Sanskrit name, Sanatana Dharma.

While it is true that Hinduism is uncreated and eternal, there had to be a point in time that Hinduism had to be established on Earth in this current Mahayuga. The time period around which Hinduism was founded is circa 8000 BCE i.e 10,000 years ago by Rishi Brihaspati and other Saptarishis.

Hinduism in its earliest form was simply known as Dharma. In all the Shastras esp the Puranas  and other Holy Scriptures, the word Hinduism is never mentioned as the name of the religion, save for the geographical term Hindustan in the Bhavishya Purana to denote whole of the Indian Subcontinent. Hence, the term used to describe the inhabitants of Hindustan slowly evolved from the term Aryas into Hindus, and our religion was simply known as the Hindu Dharma, anglicized into Hinduism.

In hindsight Hinduism is not really a religion per say as religion requires blind faith and fanaticism to function. Hinduism is a way of life, something greater than a religion. It is Dharma and requires facts and scientific inquiry to function.

Dharma is based on Individual Duty, Social Order, and Bhakti i.e Devotional Love for God. The Dharma aspect focuses on the Code of Conduct one must follow to peacefully live a happy life while Bhakti focuses on the Devotional Relationship one has with God in order to attain Freedom from this world of suffering and attain everlasting Oneness with God.

But I digressed. Hinduism and the Indian Civilisation are always one and the same. Where ever we Hindus and Indians go, we always take a little piece of Hindu and Indian civilisation with us. Thus where ever we Hindus live that place becomes a small piece of Bharat or Aryavarta.  The Ancient Indus Valley Civilisation, also known as the Harrapan Civilisation was thought to have been the first urban based society in India that began circa 3000 BCE, but recent archeological excavations have provided evidence that the Harrapan Civilisation may have been 1000 years older than previously thought, and the new finding suggest it was founded around 4000 BCE.

But what is really intriguing is that there was another, even earlier civilisation with respect to the Harrapan Civilisation, simply known as the Pre-Harrapan Civilisation. Archological discoveries have shown that its most earliest urban settlements were founded well before 8,000 BCE. With this, we can conclude, Hindu Civilisation is over 10,000 years old.

So what was the name of this Pre-Harrapan Civilisation? According to the Puranas, there was a King by the name of Prithu. This King, says the Puranas, was the first King of an urban based society. Much of the founding of agriculture and animal husbandry in India has been credited to him in the Puranas. It says that before King Prithu's initiative to spread agriculture through his kingdom, there were no markets, no mines, towns and cities. This all changed thanks to King Prithu, and towns and industries sprang up throughout India.

Indian society tends to name themselves after the name of their ruler. Just like the oppressive rule of India under the British was known as the British Raj, so too was Prithu's empire known as Prithu Raj lit. the Reign of Prithu.

All this happened 10,000 years ago. As the Indian civilisation slowly developed, so did Hinduism thanks to the many learned Rishis and Avatars over time.

According to Puranas, Lord Brahma created the Saptarishis lit. the Seven Sages. These seven Rishis, chief among them Rishi Brihaspati established Dharma (as Hinduism was known at that time) on earth.

The followers of Dharma called themselves Aryas (now known as Hindus), and they followed their Varnadharma i.e their Dharma as a Brahman, Kshatriya, Vaisyas, and Sudra without fail and discrimination.

Hence, we know that Hinduism was founded 10,000 years ago, circa 8000 BCE, in India by Rishi Brihaspati and other Saptarishi around Prithu Raj, and called themselves Aryas.

Thank you for your time, Namaste and Om Har Har Mahadev.

Saturday 25 February 2017

Pick-Me-Up Sauce Has Fish In It - Avoid Eating it in Puja

Announcement: Please Share!

Pick-Me-Up Sauce is not to be eaten by vegetarians and around Puja. This is because it has anchovies, a species of fish like sardines, as one of its main ingredients.

Please avoid eating if you are a pure vegetarian and would not like to consume anything associated with any flesh.

One of my friends noticed yesterday (25/02/2017) in Shivaratri Puja somebody consuming the sauce after the Puja. That person was a vegetarian and had no idea he was consuming a product which had fish in it, and that in Puja day.

This announcement is designed to create community awareness, given some are vegetarian and may not know its ingredients, especially in the rural areas.

Special thanks to L'Aryan Verma for bringing this issue in to light.

Please Share this post to raise awareness.

Thank you and Om Har Har Mahadev

Friday 17 February 2017

Do Not Abandon Your Hindu Identity

There is only one thing important for us in Kalyug, this Age of Darkness, and that is Bhakti. Bhakti is having Devotion Love towards the One God of the Universe. Bhakti can either be found through ritualistic worship such as Puja or it can be a simple faith and belief in God. 

However, all of our Bhakti is for nothing if we do not know who we are, where we come from, and where are we  going. To be God loving and good people, we first have to know who we are.

So, who are we? Who are you? What is your identity? Your national identity? Ask yourself, what is my identity?

Of course your reply would be your name, like my name is Aoneesh Arun Sharma, and your name is so on and so forth.  But this only partially unansweres, where do we belong? Who are we in this world?

Ladies and gentlemen, the truth is we have forgotten our true identity. Our Hindu identity. In this westernized world of degrading pleasure and material desires we have forgotten who we are and where we belong.

Let us digress for a bit and look at our past. Around 4.2 to 4.5 billion years ago the Earth was created. Than 530 million to 420 million years ago life stated to appear on Earth. 4.2 million years ago the first men walked the Earth and  around 10000 years ago in the year c8000 BCE one of the world’s earliest civilisations appeared. This civilisation, is known today as the Pre-Harrapan Civilisation, but to us Hindus, who are well versed in the Puranas, we know it as Prithu Raj.

Ladies and gentlemen, this civilisation was the world’s first. The first vedic civilisation, its people were were known as the Arya people and their religion, or more acurately, the way of life was simply known as Dharma.

The terms best used to identify Arya and Dharma to denote the identity and religion in the modern era are Hindu and Hinduism.
Hinduism is the worlds oldest religion. We Hindus, should take pride in the fact that our religion is the worlds oldest religion, and for 9500 years, in its 95% of its existence, Hinduism was the largest religion of the world. Stretching from Afghanistan to all the way to the Philippines, Hinduism was the religion of countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Lanka, Indonesia, and Malaysia. 

This changed when Islamic conquerors and Christian colonists came to conquer and steal the lands of the native people. In order to have strong control over the conquered Hindus, they sought to destroy their Hindu Identity and make them loyal to their conquerors.  They removed these peoples Hindu Identity and imposed on them what they were not, so that they were under their control, and would not rebel against them.

This lead to a chain reaction that still affects our people today.  A new phenomenon is taking place. The new young middle class misled by globalization-era economics and entertained by the electronic media, with high levels of personal insecurities and hardly any time or inclination to delve into any Hindu texts leave aside their religious and spiritual beliefs and has now started to call historical events such as Ramayan, Mahabharat, and the Purans as false myths and stories of the past time.

Another aspect of the loss of Hindu culture is that the younger Hindu people, especially youths, ages 15 to 25, are readily giving up Hindu beliefs in order to follow the more decadent so-called freedoms of the Western and European culture. They see the western movies, read what the celebrities say in the papers, and admire them. They want to adopt their forms of dress and follow their decadent lifestyles. Thus, the Hindu principles are now looked upon as something obsolete, something that restricts their style to those who look to the decadent West and want to adopt their decadent ways. Thus, they are abandoning Hindu culture behind and losing respect for anything Hindu. In this way, they adopt foreign standards, or lose so much respect for Hindu values that they become embarrassed to admit their own Hindu background and heritage. Furthermore, Sanskrit scholars at the temples are also slowly dying out, and the modern Hindus view historical events of Ramayana and Mahabharata as mere myths or gaudy television shows.

Although India has been invaded by outsiders so many times, it has always survived, what we are talking about is more than mere property or geography. What is actually being threatened is the basis of Hindu religion itself. As younger generations give up their Hindu heritage more and more Hindu children and youths lose faith in themselves and in their identity, they become lost, and hence are vulnerable to becoming victims of the predatory decadence of the European culture.

How many more generations will it take before the Hindu culture and religion is no more? As Hinduism declines, we will see more of our youths losing their identity and confidence in themselves. Think about your children.
We, Hindus, are the people to first have discovered Evolution. We, Hindus, are the people to discover the Big Bang Theory. We are the ones who discovered the concept of Zero in counting. The world uses our counting system in their mathematics. The Arabic Numerals were adopted from the Hindu Numerals. We knew about embryology and development of an embryo thousands of years beofore modern science rediscovered it. The British stole the plastic Surgery and Rhinoplasty from us. We knew the world had 7 continents thousands of years ago and the Europeans discovered all only 400 years ago.

Read the Puranas, all of the above scientific discoveries mentioned above and many more were recorded in it.

Our law code, the Manusmriti, 2500 years old had rules regulating wars which were even more human than the modern Geneva convention. Just read up Manusmriti chapter 7 verse 90 – 93.

And yet despite the rich culture and strong cultural basis of our religion, we have lost souls who abandon God and become atheists because science has evolution and big bang theory and we don’t.

The People DO NOT KNOW, that is why they abandon their identity.

We have people abandoning their Identity because they were sick and their "leg was paining". They fall for the witchcraft of witch-doctors of Mlechcha Dharma. Because they do not know the comforts of Bhagavad Gita, and the hope it instills in the sick and the grieving.

WE must adopt the Kshatriya spirit to protect Hindu Dharma and focus on Hindu weaknesses for our self defense. We must develop a broader Hindu Community Identity. And that identity is our Hindu Samaj.

The point of all this information is that it is time for all Hindus and followers of Hindu culture, the Hindu religion, to realize what is actually happening and give up our timidness or showing no concern and speak out while such freedom still exists. We must become more pro-active to defend Our Hindu Culture, Our Hindu Religion, and Our Hindu Identity. The point is that if you do not take it seriously, I can assure you that there are others who will take this inaction and tolerance extremely seriously to convert and propagate their own decadent lifestyles at the expense of Our Hindu Identiy, Community, and Culture. It is because of this that Our Religion and Our Identity may not always be ever lasting. 

I fear if we do not take action, than our Sanatana Dharma will not always be Sanatan. God help those who help themselves. If our Karma is not to do anything to save and protect Our Religion and Our Identity than our Karma-dund will be the death of who we are, and how we live. We need to protect whatever is left of it and maintain the present liberties that Hindus still have. We need to unite ourselves to survive as a people. And it most certainly is possible.

Lets just look at the country Russia for a moment. It is a western country and in the past had 0% of Hindu people living in it. Now more than 1% of the Russian people claim to be Hindus. In a country of 150 million people, 1% amounts to more than 1.5 miilion Hindus. This was primarily due to the preaching efforts of ISKCON and shows a major social impact our culture has on the world. If we can work together in a concerted effort to save Our Culture and Our Identity, than we will succeed. We only need to try.

Hindu Identity, Culture and Religion must always be protected. Without it, what is our value? In spite of whatever else we accomplish? Without Hinduism, We have no future. Hinduism is the soil in which Our roots are struck. Tear it out, and we will whither out of existence. If We let Hinduism vanish than who are we? If Hindus do not maintain Hinduism, who will? If Hinduism's own children do not cling to their faith, who shall guard it? Hindus alone can save Hinduism, and Hinduism alone can save Hindus. Because Hindus and Hinduism are one.

In this light, it is absolutely necessary that as followers of Hindu Dharma and Culture, we need to realize that we need to heal whatever differences we may have between us regarding whatever issues there may be. 

We cannot allow ourselves to be led into the danger of endless debate that leads to nothing but inaction. We all must be pro-active in some way to help defend and spread Vedic Culture. Then we can work together to keep the freedom we presently have to practice the Hindu traditions and keep our Hindu identity as a thriving, dynamic, and still living people. Such freedom does not come without its challenges, and we must be prepared as a people to meet those challenges. To take such freedoms for granted means that it’s only a matter of time before they are lost. And that is exactly what some people want to happen. So we must be willing to work all the harder to prevent such a decline of our Hindu heritage and our Hindu identity as a person, and a people.


If you want to know what it is to be a Hindu, than go read Kurma Puran chapter 2 verse 53 -54, and I paraphrase, says that a Hindus purpose is to follow their Dharma, to achieve Love, Success and Salvation. But a Hindu’s Dharma is the source of these 3.

Reference: 
Stephan Knapp